Discuss leadership styles attributes and how styles can affect the operation and atmosphere of the organization.

The meaning of leadership varies to different persons but in my opinion it is all about process by which a person influences others to accomplish an objective and directs the organization in a way that makes it more cohesive and coherent. The ultimate goal of the organization and the organization culture are the main elements that determine the styles of leadership in an organization. Different organizations have been using different styles of leadership according to the need and requirement of the organizations.

There are diverse leadership styles took after by distinctive leaders. Diverse circumstance require distinctive leadership styles to take care of the issues. A few majors' leadership styles are as per the following:

Autocratic Style:

This is a customary process of leadership, and what might as well be called autocracy. This leadership style is marked with the leader having complete power and the devotees complying with the guidelines of the leader without addressing and without accepting a clarification or method of reasoning for such directions. This leadership style builds itself in light of Douglas Mcgregor's Theory X that considers representatives as regularly apathetic and disliking work, and assumes they try to dodge act however much as could be expected.

Participative  Style:

A leader utilizing a fair or participative leadership style, will captivate the gathering inside the choice making process, they will consider the gatherings inputs; be that as it may, he/she will hold their entitlement to settle on an official conclusion. As it synonymous name of participative leadership style suggests, leader permit, look for and even go the extent that to strengthen participative practices. As an issue, the members will feel captivated; they will be more innovative and will offer more deliberations to guaranteeing a powerful and proficient culmination of the objectives.

Laissez-faire style:

In this sort of leadership, the leader is simply a figure head and does not give any bearing. He acts essentially as an issue between the gathering and the outside components and supplies essential materials and gives data to gathering parts. He lets the subordinates arrange and lives up to expectations their systems for fulfilling objectives inside the summed up authoritative strategies and targets. The leader takes an interest almost no and as opposed to heading and guiding, he gets to be only one of the parts. He doesn't endeavor to mediate or direct or control and there is finished gathering or individual opportunity in choice making.

Narcissistic Style:

Narcissistic leadership is an leadership style in which the leader is eventually just intrigued by him/herself. Their need is themselves and can be at the cost of their organization. This sort of leader displays the attributes of a narcissist: self-importance, predominance and antagonistic vibe. It is a genuinely basic leadership style. The narcissism may extend anyplace from beneficial to damaging.

Toxic Style:

Toxic leaders think about themselves. They just think about their sentiments and dismissal those of others. Some way or another, dangerous leadership is identified with totalitarian leadership style. Such leaders act forcefully and treat others horrendously. They disseminate undertakings in a prohibitive way and even attempt to threaten their subordinates keeping in mind the end goal to save choked control. Lethal leadership is achieved by absence of mindfulness, absence of discretion and certainty, all of which are seeded independent from anyone else interest. As an issue, a Toxic leader's subordinates dislike him or her.

The effect of leadership is critical, either decidedly or contrarily influenced. Great leadership brings more noteworthy gainfulness and higher execution. Anyway, poor leadership can bring low spirit and poor execution. Such a variety of associations are determined by their own particular style of leadership. In spite of the fact that they are not after the same styles, they are fruitful on dealing with their organizations. As I would see it, incredible leaders have the capacity adjust their style as per the circumstances and individuals they are overseeing. It obliges them to have solid mindfulness and an abnormal state of enthusiastic sagacity with the goal that they comprehend the effect that they have on others. Their aptitude decides the achievement and disappointment of associations.

References

Goleman, D. (March - April 2004). Leadership that gets result : Harvard Business Review.

Mind Tools. (n.d.). Leadership Styles. Retrieved from http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_84.html